THE RESOURCES USED IN COMPILING A HOUSE HISTORY ARE MANY. THE PRINCIPAL ORGANIZATIONAL RESOURCES ARE THE FOLLOWING:
THE PROCESS
ADDING DETAILS: THE RECORDERS OFFICE.
THE NEXT STOP IS THE RECORDER'S OFFICE (IF YOU ARE NOT THERE ALREADY BECAUSE OF A DEAD END AT THE ASSESSOR'S.) YOUR GOAL HERE IS TO REVIEW THE DEEDS INVOLVED IN THE HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY. RECENT DEEDS ARE BORING PRINTED INSTRUMENTS,, AND HOLD LITTLE INTEREST. THE DEEDS BEFORE 1940 OR SO ARE HAND-WRITTEN AND ARE OF MORE INTEREST. THEY ARE LENGTHY, WITH COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS, DISCUSSIONS OF THE FINANCING OF THE TRANSACTION, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, AND SO FORTH, AND ARE SIGNED BY THE OWNERS. READING THE DEEDS, PARTICULARLY THE EARLY ONES, IS A WORTHWHILE USE OF TIME. IF YOU WANT COPIES OF THE INSTRUMENTS, THE MICROFILM DEPARTMENT IN ROOM1 HAS THEM ON FILM AND WILL MAKE COPIES. YOU WILL NEED THE VOLUME AND PAGE NUMBER FOR EACH ONE YOU WANT IN HARD COPY.
THE RECORDERS OFFICE IS ALSO THE PLACE TO EXAMINE MAPS AND PLATS OF THE AREA OF INTEREST. IN ROOM 128, THE ORIGINAL PLAT BOOKS ARE KEPT, AS ARE SURVEYOR'S RECORDS (SKETCH MAPS). THESE ARE INDEXED BOTH BY SUBDIVISION AND BY CITY BLOCK NUMBER IN A SET OF LOOSE LEAF BINDERS MAINTAINED IN THE OFFICE. THE INFORMATION WHICH CAN BE GLEANED HERE INCLUDES THE ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPERTY, OLD STREET NAMES, BUILDINGS IN PLACE AT THE TIME IT WAS DEVELOPED AND SO ON. CAREFUL STUDY OF THE PLAT AND SURVEY MAPS SHOULD PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE EARLIEST OWNERS (SUBDIVISION DEVELOPERS) AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROPERTY TO OLD FRENCH AND SPANISH LAND GRANTS. HOWEVER, THIS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL RESEARCH (SEE "EMBELLISHMENTS" BELOW).
LEARNING ABOUT THE HOUSE
HAVING ESTABLISHED THE THREAD OF OWNERSHIP, THE NEXT STEP IS TO FIND OUT WHAT YOU CAN ABOUT THE BUILDINGS ON THE PROPERTY. THIS IS A DIFFICULT AREA. BUILDING PERMIT RECORDS ARE KEPT IN THE MICROFILM ROOM IN CITY HALL. ARRANGED BY BLOCK NUMBER, THE INDEX OF PERMITS GOES BACK TO ABOUT 1870, BUT THERE ARE GAPS. KNOWING THE NAME OF THE EARLY OWNERS AND THE BLOCK NUMBER EQUIPS YOU TO APPROXIMATE THE DATE OF CONSTRUCTION FROM THE DATE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT RECORD. YOU CAN ALSO EXAMINE TWO OTHER SETS OF RECORDS MAINTAINED BY BLOCK NUMBER ON MICROFILM--FIRE MAPS DATING FROM THE 1870'S, WHICH SHOW ALL BUILDINGS, THE NUMBER OF STORIES, AND THE LOCATION OF STAIRS; AND A HOUSE BY HOUSE ASSEMENT SURVEY DONE IN THE 1930'S WHICH INCLUDES A CONSTRUCTION DATE AMONG OTHER DETAILS OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EACH BUILDING. THIS SURVEY IS VERY INACCURATE IN DATES, HOWEVER, AND THE BUILDING PERMITS ARE BETTER GUIDES.
LEARNING ABOUT THE PEOPLE
YOU NOW SHOULD HAVE A FAIRLY COMPLETE RECORD OF THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY. THE DEEDS DON'T TELL YOU ANYTHING ABOUT THE OWNERS' OCCUPATION, BACKGROUNDS, OR ABOUT ACTUAL OCCUPANTS OF THE HOUSE. THE NEXT STEP IS TO BEGIN TO FIND OUT ABOUT THEM. YOUR SEARCH NOW MOVES TO THE CENSUS RECORDS AND CITY DIRECTORIES.
THE CENSUS RECORDS ARE THE BEST SOURCE OF INFORMATION ON WHO WAS LIVING IN THE HOUSE IN A CENSUS YEAR. UNLESS THE OCCUPANCY WAS VERY STABLE OVER TIME, ONE MAY WANT MORE INFORMATION ON OCCUPANCY, AND THE ANNUAL CITY DIRECTORIES PROVIDE THIS AT VARYING LEVELS OF ACCURACY AND DETAIL. IN THE 19TH CENTURY, THESE DIRECTORIES LISTED RESIDENTS OF THE CITY ALPHABETICALLY BY LAST NAME, AND WERE ORIENTED TO THE MALES WHO WERE EMPLOYED OR OPERATING BUSINESSES. THE LISTING USUALLY INCLUDED AN OCCUPATION, A WORK ADDRESS, AND A RESIDENCE ADDRESS, AND GIVING THE NAMES OF THOSE RESIDENT IN THE DWELLING. THIS INFORMATION, THOUGH MINIMAL, WILL HELP BUILD AN OCCUPANCY HISTORY FOR A HOUSE. IT ALSO PROVIDES LEADS AS TO WHETHER THE BUILDING WAS A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING OR DIVIDED INTO ROOMS OR APARTMENTS AT A GIVEN TIME. ONCE A COMPLETE RECORD OF THE OCCUPANTS' NAMES IS ESTABLISHED, THERE ARE SEVERAL COURSES ONE MAY FOLLOW IF MORE INFORMATION CONCERNING INDIVIDUALS IS DESIRED. AMONG THE RESOURCES FOR FILLING OUT A HISTORY OF THE RESIDENTS ARE THE FOLLOWING:
THE FORGOING WILL PROVIDE THE HOUSE HISTORIAN WITH A COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY OF A PROPERTY. THE LEVEL OF DETAIL WILL DEPEND ON THE INDIVIDUAL'S PERSISTENCE AND THE TIME ONE WANTS TO INVEST IN THE EFFORT. THERE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL POSSIBILITIES FOR BUILDING AN EVEN MORE COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY, BUT THEY WILL ADD TO THE TIME INVOLVED, AND ARE CONSIGNED TO THE CATEGORY OF EMBELLISHMENTS.
THE COURSE OF ACTION OUTLINED ABOVE FOR ESTABLISHING THE HISTORY OF OWNERSHIP WOULD TAKE ONE TO THE POINT OF INITIAL SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY. ST.LOUIS HAS A FASCINATING COLONIAL LAND HISTORY AS WELL, AND THE RECORD ARE AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT AN EFFORT TO DETERMINE THAT HISTORY FOR MOST PROPERTY OF THE CITY.
THE FRENCH, INTENT MAINLY ON THE FUR TRADE, ESTABLISHED A NUMBER OF TRADING POSTS AND VILLAGES THROUGHOUT THE MISSISSIPPI BASIN THROUGH THE FIRST PART OF THE 1700'S. ST.LOUIS WAS ESTABLISHED ON THE FRENCH SIDE OF THE RIVER NEAR THE MOUTH OF THE MISSOURI IN 1764 BY PIERRE LACLEDE LIGUEST OF NEW ORLEANS. THE WEST BANK WAS CHOSEN BECAUSE THE EAST BANK HAD BEEN CEDED TO THE ENGLISH BY THE TREATY OF PARIS WHICH ENDED THE SEVEN YEARS WAR (FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR) IN 1763.
ALTHOUGH LACLEDE'S TOWN REMAINED FRENCH IN LANGUAGE, CUSTOMS, AND CHARACTER THROUGHOUT IT'S EARLY DEVELOPMENT, IT DID NOT REMAIN FRENCH IN GOVERNMENT FOR LONG. TO PROTECT THE AREA FROM THE ENGLISH VICTORS IN THE SEVEN YEARS WAR, AND TO GAIN A SMALL TERRITORY IN EUROPE, FRANCE HAD CEDED THE WESTERN PART OF THE MISSISSIPPI BASIN TO THE SPANISH CROWN IN 1762 UNDER THE TREATY OF FOUNTAINEBLEU. SPAIN DID NOT BEGIN TO EXERCISE AUTHORITY IN THE AREA UNTIL 1769, AT WHICH TIME A SPANISH GOVERNOR WAS ESTABLISHED IN NEW ORLEANS, AND A LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR FOR UPPER LOUISIANA INSTALLED AT ST.LOUIS IN 1770.
SPANISH COLONIAL ADMINISTRATION WAS RELATIVELY RELAXED. THE BUSINESS OF THE TOWN WAS CONDUCTED BY A COMBINATION OF TOWN MEETINGS, ELECTED SYNDICS, AND DECREE. THE LANGUAGE OF THE STREETS WAS FRENCH, AND MOST OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS WERE EXECUTED IN BOTH FRENCH AND SPANISH.
THE FRENCH INFLUENCE EXTENDED TO THE ORGANIZATION OF THE VILLAGE OF SAN LUIS. THE FRENCH MODEL OF LAND OWNERSHIP AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION WAS FOLLOWED, A FACTOR OF IMPORTANCE IN THE HISTORY OF ST.LOUIS PROPERTIES.
UNDER THE FRENCH MODEL FOR A VILLAGE, INDIVIDUALS OWNED PROPERTY AS INDIVIDUALS IN THE VILLAGE PROPER, WHILE THE MUNICIPALITY OWNED A COMMON AVAILABLE TO ALL LANDOWNERS FOR PASTURAGE. IN ADDITION THERE WERE COMMON FIELDS SURROUNDING THE VILLAGE. THESE WERE ALLOCATED TO RESIDENTS FOR PASTURE AND CROPS, BUT WERE NOT USUALLY OWNED BY THE INDIVIDUAL. THE COMMON FIELDS WERE FENCED AS A WHOLE, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE FENCE WAS A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY OF THE VILLAGERS. THE INDIVIDUAL PLOTS WERE TYPICALLY VERY LONG AND NARROW. ONE HISTORIAN ATTRIBUTED THIS TO THE NEED FOR PROTECTION FROM MARAUDING INDIANS, NOTING THAT BY STARTING ON THE VILLAGE END OF A NARROW PLOT AND WORKING OUTWARD, THERE WOULD ALWAYS BE ASSISTANCE IN THE VICINITY WERE A RAID TO DEVELOP. THIS THEORY, ALTHOUGH INTERESTING, BREAKS DOWN, SINCE THE SAME SYSTEM OF NARROW PLOTS WAS USED IN EUROPE.
THE COMMON FIELDS' OWNERSHIP LATER CAME INTO DISPUTE. THE OFFICERS OF THE CROWN CONSIDERED THEM PART OF THE ROYAL DOMAIN, WHILE THE VILLAGERS CONSIDERED THEM THE PROPERTY OF THE COMMUNITY.
LAND MANAGEMENT IN THE SPANISH PERIOD WAS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF A SPANISH COLONIAL OFFICIAL CALLED THE "INTENDANT". THE INTENDANT WAS ASSIGNED ALL DUTIES CONCERNED WITH ROYAL FUNDS AND LANDS. IN UPPER LOUISIANA, THE POWERS OF BOTH THE GOVERNOR AND THE INTENDANT IN NEW ORLEANS WERE DELEGATED TO THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR. THE VARIOUS LIEUTENANTS GOVERNOR IN SAN LUIS USED THIS DELEGATION IN DIFFERENT WAYS. WHEN THEY EXCEEDED THE GOVERNOR'S OR INTENDANT'S VIEW OF THEIR AUTHORITY, THE OFFICIAL IN NEW ORLEANS WAS QUICK TO REMIND THEM WHERE THE REAL POWER WAS VESTED.
THE SPANISH USED A SYSTEM OF LAND GRANTS AS A MEANS OF TRANSFERRING PROPERTY FROM THE ROYAL DOMAIN TO PRIVATE OWNERSHIP. GENERALLY, SUCH GRANTS WERE GIVEN AS REWARDS OR IN RESPONSE TO SPECIAL PLEAS FROM SPANISH SUBJECTS. THE GRANTS VARIED WIDELY IN EXTENT, RANGING FROM A FEW ARPENS TO TENS OF THOUSANDS OF ARPENS. FURTHER, SINCE THERE WAS NO ORGANIZED SYSTEM OF DIVIDING LAND (SUCH AS THE SECTION SYSTEM USED BY THE AMERICANS) THE GRANTS WERE IRREGULAR IN SHAPE AS WELL AS SIZE, AND OFTEN OVERLAPPED WITH ONE ANOTHER AS A RESULT OF POOR SURVEYING AND RECORDING SYSTEMS.
TO COMPLICATE THE SITUATION IN SAN LUIS, THE LAST SPANISH LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, DON CARLOS DeLASSUS, SEEMS TO HAVE ANTICIPATED THE TRANSFER OF THE WESTERN MISSISSIPPI BASIN TO AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY IN 1804 BY DISTRIBUTING LARGE TRACTS OF THE SPANISH ROYAL DOMAIN TO HIS FAMILY AND FRIENDS IN 1803, APPARENTLY BACK-DATING SOME OF THE GRANTS TO MAKE THE ACTION SEEM LESS PRECIPITOUS.
THIS RESULTED IN A PROLONGED SET OF LEGAL BATTLES THROUGHOUT THE FIRST HALF OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY AS THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ATTEMPTED TO ADJUDICATE CONFLICTING CLAIMS OF OWNERSHIP BASED ON THE SPANISH GRANTS, COMMON FIELD CLAIMS, AND OTHER FACTORS. FOR THE HOUSE HISTORIAN, THESE LEGAL CONFLICTS ARE A BOON, BECAUSE THEY LED TO EXTENSIVE DOCUMENTATION OF PATTERNS OF OWNERSHIP IN THE PERIOD BEFORE 1804. KNOWING THE LOCATION OF A PROPERTY AND ITS TITLE HISTORY, ONE CAN MOVE FURTHER BACK IN ITS HISTORY USING THE RECORDS ATTENDANT ON THESE LEGAL DISPUTES.
THE MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY IS THE PLACE TO START. THEIR MAP COLLECTION CONTAINS SEVERAL MAPS WHICH DELINEATE THE OLD SPANISH CLAIMS, AND WHICH CAN SERVE AS AN ENTREE TO THE VARIOUS LEGAL DOCUMENTS WHICH CONFIRM OR DENY THE VALIDITY OF THE CLAIMS. THESE DOCUMENTS INCLUDE LAWSUITS, REPORTS OF LAND COMMISSIONERS, AND ACTS OF CONGRESS AND THEIR SUPPORTING REPORTS. CAREFUL RESEARCH SHOULD ALLOW ONE TO FILL IN THE GAPS BETWEEN THE FIRST DEEDS AND THE SPANISH GRANT ERA, AND TO DOCUMENT THE OWNERSHIP OF ANY PROPERTY BACK TO THE FRENCH ROYAL DOMAIN OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.
ANOTHER EMBELLISHMENT FOR A HOUSE HISTORY ARE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE STRUCTURE AND/OR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AT VARIOUS POINTS IN ITS HISTORY. THERE ARE EXCELLENT RESOURCES AVAILABLE, BUT THIS IS A SLOW PROCESS OF SORTING THROUGH HUNDREDS OF STREET SCENES, ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOS, AND OTHER MATERIALS ON THE CHANCE THAT THE BUILDING OF INTEREST WAS INCLUDED IN AN OLD PHOTO. THE ST.LOUIS PUBLIC LIBRARY AND THE MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY BOTH MAINTAIN COLLECTIONS ARRANGED BY TOPIC, BUT NOT CATALOGED BY PHOTO. ADVANCE APPOINTMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO USE THE MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY PHOTO ARCHIVES.
PHOTOGRAPHS ARE OF PARTICULAR INTEREST TO THOSE LIVING IN THE AREA INVOLVED IN THE TORNADO DAMAGE IN 1896. THIS EVENT WAS WELL DOCUMENTED BY THE PHOTOGRAPHERS OF THE TIME, AND IF A STRUCTURE WAS SEVERELY DAMAGED, THERE IS AN EXCELLENT CHANCE OF LOCATING A PHOTO OF THE DAMAGE IN ONE OF THE PHOTO COLLECTIONS.
HOME | DOGTOWN |
Bibliography | Oral history | Recorded history | Photos |
YOUR page | External links | Walking Tour |