[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
#870: ACN: A response
Posted anonymously
>
> From: "Ambassade d'Haïti" <embassy@haiti.org>
> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 14:01:59 -0200
> Subject: Re: ACN
> Priority: normal
> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12a)
>
> Date sent: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 16:40:02 -0400
> To: embassy@haiti.org
>
> Subject: ACN
>
> > To Whom It May Concern:
> >
> > Please do what you can to re-open ACN in Haiti. Shutting it down may
serve
>
> > to pad some people's pockets in the short term, but in the bigger
picture,
> > it is counter-productive, counter-freedom, and is just one more way Haiti
> > seems to be on a path of self destruct. Mesi et bon korage,
>
>
>
> In response to your letter of protest dated October 15, 1999, I would
like to
> share with you the following facts:
>
> The Executive Committee of the National Telecommunications Council (CONATEL)
> of the Republic of Haiti proceeded with a series of surprise visits on
> September 27, 1999 to its license-holders following complaints from the
> national telephone company (TELECO) that international calls [and the
revenue
> provided by same] were being fraudulently diverted.
>
> The first visit undertaken was to the office of Alpha Communication Network
> (ACN) where officials observed numerous irregularities including the
> installation of unauthorized equipment. At the request of CONATEL and in the
> presence of officials from TELECO a magistrate proceeded to the premises of
> ACN. Subsequently, CONATEL temporarily suspended the usage license
granted to
> the firm.
>
> Another visit was made the same day to the firm DIGICOM in Boutilliers
[north
> of Haiti?s capital Port-au-Prince] where unauthorized equipment was also
> dismantled and placed under seal.
>
> On Thursday, September 30, 1999 CONATEL held a meeting in its offices with
> two officials from ACN. This occasion was used to inform them of the actions
> which they needed to take with regard to their equipment to allow the
lifting
> of sanctions against them. In this way, a list of urgent steps to be
taken by
> ACN was communicated to them and they agreed to comply in the shortest
> possible time.
>
> On Tuesday, October 5, 1999, a second meeting took place at CONATEL with
> representatives of ACN during which the latter recognized their faults and
> demanded a reduction in the penalties imposed by CONATEL. ACN?s
> representatives also desired to consult with their President and
> Director-General on this question. At that point another meeting was
> scheduled for the following day.
>
> On October 7, 1999, DIGICOM , after having satisfied the demands by
CONATEL -
> particularly in paying the fine imposed upon them - was authorized to renew
> services to their clientele.
>
> In conclusion, the Embassy of Haiti wishes to point out the fact that ACN
did
> not return to the discussion table and that the lifting of sanctions against
> ACN depends upon their fulfilling the conditions to which they agreed at the
> meeting of September 30th.
>
> Moreover, CONATEL, which subsequently inspected the facilities of numerous
> radio stations [possessing Internet broadcast capability] and other Internet
> Service Providers (ISPs) in the country, promises to continue with such
> inspections as it deems necessary.
>
> I hope this sheds more light on a situation which has nothing to do with the
> abrogation of free speech in Haiti.
>
> Sincerely,
> John Kozyn, Consultant Embassy of Haiti