16156: Karshan: Sen. Christopher Dodd speech at Committee on Foreign Relations/Haiti hearing (fwd)

[Bob Corbett <corbetre@webster.edu>]

From: MKarshan@aol.com

    Statement by Senator Christopher J. Dodd
    Committee on Foreign Relations
    "Successes and Challenges for U.S. Policy to Haiti"
    July 15, 2003


    Mr. Chairman, I want to commend you for holding this hearing
today on the current situation in Haiti. You have invited some very
expert witnesses this morning who should help the committee members
better understand what is happening in Haiti today and what we might do
about it.

    As one who has been an observer of the Haitian situation for
some time, I am deeply concerned by recent developments in that country.
The situation has gone from bad to worse - anyone who has visited Haiti
in recent years knows what I mean.  People living less than 200 miles
from our shores are desperately poor beyond imagination, have life
expectancies of less than 50, suffer from malaria, diarrhea, and even
polio, which has reemerged on the island.  Haiti ranks as one of the
lowest on the U.N. survey of living conditions. Out of 176 countries
ranked by the UN - Haiti was near the bottom of the ladder - 34th from
the bottom.
    Mr. Chairman, Haiti is sinking deeper and deeper into
irreversible poverty. The extent of the heartache now being endured by
the Haitian people is simply unspeakable. Their suffering is devastating
and it is far reaching. In some places there is no potable water, there
are no sewers, there are no basic medicines on hand to treat disease, no
medical infrastructure in place to ward off otherwise easily preventable
diseases.  As we know from our consideration of the HIV/AIDS
legislation, Haiti is also being devastated by that dreaded disease.

    There are a lot of reasons for the sorry state in which we find
Haiti today.  Clearly the Haitian government must be a key actor in
meeting the needs of its people.  That it is failing to do so is self
evident.  There are many reasons for that - some are within that
government's power to address - others are not.



    Frankly, we need to be honest and acknowledge that until very
recently the United States also bore a measure of responsibility for the
worsening of conditions in that country.

    I am speaking of US decisions to stop all bilateral assistance
to Haitian government agencies and to join with other OAS members in
blocking Haiti's access to InterAmerican Development Bank resources.
Both have contributed to making a dire situation worse.  While it is
true that the US is a substantial donor of food to Haiti, that is simply
a holding pattern to keep people from dying from starvation and does
little or nothing to address the systemic problems confronting the
Haitian economy and Haitian institutions.
    I have been extremely critical of the decision by the US and
others to tie Haiti's access to IDB resources to a political settlement
of the disputed May 2000 elections, because I think that was mixing
apples with oranges.  The IDB is supposed to be the premier regional
development institution in this hemisphere, charged with alleviating
poverty and promoting development.
    It should not have been politicized as was the case with respect
to Haiti.  If there is any country in the region that needs the IDB's
help more than Haiti, I don't know which country that would be.

     I believe that it should be the people of Haiti who are in the
forefront of our concerns as we make policy decisions to restrict aid
resources to that country.  At long last, it would appear that the US
government and the international community share that view.  Haitian
authorities have reached an agreement with the IMF and have paid off the
arrears owed to the IDB.

    Next week the President of the InterAmerican Development Bank
will visit Haiti and sign an agreement with the Aristide government
which will allow for the quick disbursement of some $35 million in
technical assistance.  Shortly thereafter, an additional $146 million in
stalled IDB project assistance will be available to help address
deficiencies in the areas of  health, water, roads and education.
    That's good news.
    Finally we seem to have a strategy for dealing with some of the
economic challenges confronting Haiti.  I would also hope that the Bush
administration would re-engage with Haitian agencies on a bilateral
basis as well - particularly in the areas of health and security.  There
is no way that there is going to be any measurable improvement in either
area unless the US re-engages in these sectors.

    So too the OAS needs to re-engage on the political front.  For
more than two years, I supported the efforts of the OAS Secretary
General to end the political crisis that is rooted in earlier flawed
elections.  I believe that a proposal tabled last year by Luigi Einaudi,
the Assistant Secretary General of the OAS, which provides for a series
of steps leading ultimately to elections  made a great deal of sense.
The Aristide government supported the OAS plan - some elements of the
opposition have not.  The impasse has meant that there has been very
little progress on the political front.  I am concerned that lack of
progress at some point is going to produce a major crisis.

    By the end of this year, the electoral terms of the entire
Haitian Congress and one-third of the Haitian Senate will have expired.
How is the Haitian government supposed to function in the absence of a
functioning legislature?

    To be kind, the OAS seems to be in a holding pattern.  But in
Haiti, there is no such thing as the status quo.  The ongoing political
stalemate has fostered even greater divisions in Haitian society -
positions continue to harden, making compromise even more difficult than
it would have been six months ago.  I am concerned that neither the US
administration or the leadership of the OAS seem to have developed a
strategy for what is likely to come next in Haiti if OAS Resolution 822
is not successfully implemented soon.

    Last month during the OAS annual meetings, Secretary of State
Colin Powell announced that in September the US would be reassess its
support for the OAS efforts, including the OAS mission in Haiti.
    I will be very interested to hear from Secretary Grossman
exactly what Secretary Powell meant by those words.  It is not clear to
me that either the US administration or the OAS leadership has any game
plan for helping Haiti resolve the political impasse it finds itself
caught in - namely wanting and needed to have elections either by the
end of the year or shortly thereafter - but not being able to get all
the players to join with the government in those elections.

    Mr. Chairman, the Haitian people are a proud people - they love
their families and they love their country.  Next year, Haiti will
celebrate its bicentennial anniversary of independence.  This should be
a time of joy and celebration.  It is not going to be so in the current
climate of mistrust and insecurity.  I look forward to hearing from our
witnesses this morning what they think should be done on the economic
and political fronts to address the many challenges which confront Haiti
so that the upcoming 200th Haitian anniversary of independence can be
more than a date on the calendar.