18004: (Chamberlain) Haiti solutions (fwd)

[Bob Corbett <corbetre@webster.edu>]

From: Greg Chamberlain <GregChamberlain@compuserve.com>

(Sun-Sentinel, 7 Dec 03)


'It's an unnatural disaster, a man-made disaster'

Many experts believe Haiti is not beyond hope, but it will take enormous
effort to save the nation

By Tim Collie



PORT-AU-PRINCE -- Ask ordinary Haitians what could improve their lives, and
the answers seem simple. Food. Clean water. Good roads. Medicine. A roof
over their heads.

In the Artibonite Valley, farmers want irrigation and fertilizer to grow
crops. In the famine-plagued northwest, villagers want jobs that pay a
living wage. In the capital's slums, many would be happy with a toilet.

"We just want someplace other than this ditch to go to the bathroom," says
Baby Lumeus, a 35-year-old resident of the God's Village slum, standing
beside a canal filled with garbage and dead animals. "There is not a single
latrine in this area, a simple toilet. We've had [non-governmental
agencies] come through here all the time, making notes, promising things,
sometimes even collecting money. But nothing ever improves."

There are no easy solutions, and international efforts to reverse Haiti's
decline have gone awry for decades. Billions of dollars have been poured
into the country -- American taxpayers alone have spent $900 million since
1994. Most of the money has been wasted because of corruption, incompetence
and the daunting challenge of rebuilding Haiti's governmental and economic
systems.

The country's fractious politics, insular rural culture and profound class
divisions have resisted change, compounded by 200 years of international
isolation and troubled relations with Haiti's largest neighbor and
benefactor, the United States. All have contributed to Haiti's ecological
crisis. The millions spent to preserve wilderness areas, upgrade water
quality and develop sustainable agriculture have done little to improve
life in the poverty-ravaged cities and countryside.

"The environmental crisis is very real and entails much suffering,'' says
Glenn Smucker, a cultural anthropologist who has worked in Haiti for two
decades doing studies for the U.S. government and other organizations.
"It's about soil and water erosion, agrarian and population pressures on
the land, political crisis and ineptitude, and erosion of many, if not
most, of the formal structures of society."

People are flooding into Haiti's cities or fleeing to other countries.
Without access to modern farming techniques, equipment or expertise,
peasant farmers barely survive. The Creole-speaking poor have labored for
generations as subsistence producers for French-speaking upper classes,
which consume wood, food and water at enormous rates. Haiti's villages have
remained beyond the reach of national systems of electricity, running
water, education and medicine.

"Breaking the cycle of poverty will require a significant reduction in the
pace of environmental decay," writes Michel-Rolph Trouillot, a University
of Chicago anthropologist who has written extensively on Haitian peasant
culture. "The Haitian state will never muster the resources necessary to
revive the whole national landscape.

"Small but successful reforestation programs show that environmental
degradation can be reversed ... on one condition: The peasantry must be
convinced to participate."

Many experts believe Haiti is not beyond hope. It has a relatively small
population -- one-third of Iraq's -- and is located in a stable region.
With sufficient foreign aid -- at least $1 billion immediately, says Dr.
Paul Farmer, a physician with long experience with Haiti's poor -- the
nation could invest in hospitals, schools, health care, electrical systems
and vital infrastructure.

South Korea and Thailand were in a similar situation 50 years ago and were
able to implement governmental reforms and foreign investment. Haiti has
the advantage of proximity to the United States. With economic growth and
political stability, Haiti could develop much-needed programs to build
roads and water-treatment plants, protect forests and halt erosion.

But other experts are deeply pessimistic about Haiti's ability to change or
to capture U.S. attention in an age of global terrorism and military action
in Central Asia and the Middle East. Many also believe conditions are so
dire, Haiti may have reached the point of no return.

With an election year approaching, the Bush administration is focused on
Iraq, with Congress recently authorizing $87 billion to spend there and in
Afghanistan -- a sum that dwarfs decades of U.S. assistance for Haiti.
Meanwhile, U.S. attention to the Caribbean and Latin America continues to
wane.

"We don't have the CNN effect here now like they do in other countries, and
the world is just much more focused on the Middle East and other regions,"
says Alain Grimard, a diplomat with the United Nations based in
Port-au-Prince. "People are doing a lot here to help, but this situation is
just so bad, it's going to take much more."

But even if the White House and Congress turn their attention to Haiti, an
enormous effort would be needed to nurture its nascent democracy, stabilize
the government and boost civic institutions.

Some believe the United States blew an opportunity in 1994, when troops
invaded the island nation to restore its first democratically elected
president -- Jean-Bertrand Aristide -- but withdrew before his government
could carry out significant reforms.

"The window of opportunity that opened for Haiti in 1994 is about to shut,"
says Colin Granderson, deputy secretary of CARICOM, the diplomatic
organization representing 15 Caribbean countries. "Ten years in the
attention of the international community is as good as half a century."

Still, some Haiti experts maintain that the nation's natural systems could
rebound eventually if the White House directed money and attention to
Haiti. But for that to happen, conditions in Haiti may have to get worse
before they can get better.

History has shown that U.S. and international efforts have focused on Haiti
only after a major crisis -- an epidemic, mass exodus of migrants,
hurricane, political upheaval or coup.

"If you had covered these mountains 100 years ago with high-producing fruit
trees and various other perennials, this country would still be richer than
Canada," says John Currelly, an agronomist with the Pan American
Development Foundation in Haiti. "Haiti is extremely productive and has a
tremendous recuperative capability ... The land itself, if left alone,
comes back very quickly."

But the land has never been left alone. Its riches once powered an empire,
just as poverty now hastens its collapse. The effort to harness the
environment has been at the heart of Haiti's struggles since its creation
as the first nation founded by ex-slaves in modern times.

Originally known as Saint Domingue, Haiti was the richest European colony
in the world and made many French wealthy through large sugar plantations
and coffee-producing estates during the 18th century. Its 500,000 slaves,
who outnumbered whites 15 to 1, were a mix of different groups brought from
Africa.

A war for liberation that began in 1791 destroyed most plantation systems
and sent most of the French packing. After the slaves won independence,
land wars broke out among military leaders, and the freed slaves rejected
plantation life. During the next half-century, the country lost its key
sugar and coffee markets in Europe and was isolated by the United States
and other nations.

Many freed slaves retreated to the nation's interior. Farming small plots
with little outside investment, they settled into subsistence techniques
that continue to this day.

>From 1804 until 1911, Haiti experienced dramatic political turmoil, with 15
of 19 heads of government toppled by force. During this time, government
officials taxed poor farmers on sugar and coffee crops. As these crops
became too expensive to produce, peasants turned to beans, rice, peas and
corn. There was no profit in these crops so there was little effort to
improve farming techniques.

In 1915, the United States invaded in a failed attempt to re-create
large-scale agriculture. The Americans withdrew in 1934, leaving behind
improved roads and buildings but little in the way of civic or government
institutions. In the decades that followed, international aid was
squandered by a series of repressive regimes.

The rise of Francois "Papa Doc" Duvalier in 1957 led to a 29-year
dictatorship that thwarted attempts at political, economic or agrarian
reform. Hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign aid went to regime
leaders and their cronies, according to numerous accounts.

Declining living conditions in Haiti triggered a mass exodus, as immigrants
arrived by the thousands on Florida's shores in the 1980s. That prompted
the Reagan administration to press Papa Doc's heir, Jean-Claude "Baby Doc"
Duvalier, to leave the country in 1986. Unrest followed, despite the
inauguration of Haiti's first democratically elected president, Aristide,
in 1990. A year later, Aristide was ousted by a military coup.

In 1994, the United States invaded again to stem the tide of immigrants and
to return Aristide to power. The hope was that his popularity with the poor
would help rebuild Haiti. But the United States withdrew its troops before
the government was stabilized and could bring lasting reforms to legal,
agricultural, environmental and law enforcement systems.

U.S. officials also failed to commit enough resources, despite spending
some $900 million, in training and building democratic institutions.

Without a stable government, analysts say, long-term development is
impossible.

Since 2000, Haiti has been crippled by unrest over legislative elections
swept by Aristide's Lavalas Family Party. The opposition maintains the vote
count was rigged. Opposition parties and other civic groups have accused
the government of targeting them and have refused to join an electoral
council that could establish the ground rules for elections.

Many experts believe American officials should work directly with
Aristide's government. The United States, which provides more international
aid than any other nation, has channeled it to non-governmental
organizations in the form of food and health assistance because of
corruption and government persecution of political opponents.

"I have to say when you're sitting around the table with the various
parties, you get the distinct sense that they really aren't willing to take
the necessary steps to resolve the crisis -- everyone is looking out for
themselves, and nobody seems to think in terms of what can help the
nation," says Albert Ramdin, an official with the Organization of American
States, the international diplomatic group that has been working to resolve
the electoral crisis for two years.

But isolating Aristide's government and channeling assistance to private
groups only weaken Haiti's already fragile government institutions, says
Farmer, an AIDS specialist who has lived in Haiti for two decades.

"Peasant cooperatives and the organized poor should not be required to
build clean water systems, a good public health network and public
schools," says Farmer. "Why should the poorest have to do this, when in
affluent countries such tasks are relegated to the public sector?"

Farmer and others point out that Haiti's poverty far exceeds any other
country in the Western Hemisphere. Out of a labor force of 4.1 million
people, only 110,000 have formal jobs, and at least one-third of those are
government jobs.

Many historians describe Haiti as a predatory state controlled by
politicians who see government as an avenue to wealth and power, and
affluent citizens who support them.

"It's the politics of the belly," says Robert Fatton, a Haitian-born
professor of government at the University of Virginia and author of Haiti's
Predatory Republic: The Unending Transition to Democracy. "In Haiti,
politics becomes an entrepreneurial vocation, the sole means of material
and social advancement for those not born into wealth or privilege."

Some argue that the United States should boost investment in Haiti's
development. The National Coalition for Haitian Rights, a leading human
rights group, recommends a package of trade incentives embodied in the
Haiti Economic Recovery Opportunity (HERO) bill, pending in Congress. It
would extend preferential trade treatment for Haiti's apparel industry,
pump millions of dollars into the economy and create thousands of jobs.

Some light industry -- textile production or manufacturing -- could help
Haiti. It's been tried before. In the 1970s, Haiti was the leading
manufacturer of American baseballs, until political unrest forced the
industry's leaders to flee.

But industry and agriculture can only flourish in a country where citizens
have faith in government, law and order.

"Something has caused this country to be poor almost continuously for 200
years and that is a recipe for ecological disaster in any country,
particularly one that is 70 percent mountainous with lots of tropical
rain," says Currelly, the agronomist who has lived and raised a family in
Haiti for more than 20 years. "It's not a natural disaster, it's an
unnatural disaster, a man-made disaster. It doesn't have to be like this."


__________________________

HOW YOU CAN HELP
Here is a list of some of the largest charitable organizations doing work
in Haiti:

CARE
Phone: 800-521-CARE or 800-422-7385
Web site: www.careusa.org

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
Phone: 800-736-3467
Web site: www.catholicrelief.org

PARTNERS IN HEALTH
Phone: 617-432-5256 or 617-432-0049
Web site: www.pih.org

SAVE THE CHILDREN
Phone: 203-221-4030 or 800-728-3843
Web site: www.savethechildren.org/

UNICEF
Phone: 800-367-5437
Web site: www.unicef.org