19997: radtimes: US and France Kiss and Makeup, Haitian Democracy Dies (fwd)

[Bob Corbett <corbetre@webster.edu>]

From: radtimes <resist@best.com>

US and France Kiss and Makeup, Haitian Democracy Dies

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Mar04/Felux0306.htm

by Justin Felux
March 6, 2004

Leave it to the New York Times to turn the bloody overthrow of a
democratically elected President into a veritable love story. In an article
published on March 3rd entitled "U.S. and France Set Aside Differences in
Effort to Resolve Haiti Conflict" the newspaper of record reported that "the
joint diplomacy over Haiti is a dramatic example of how the longtime allies
can set aside differences, find common ground, play to their strengths and
even operate in an atmosphere of trust." The story goes on to weave a tale
so charming and rosy that one would never guess scores of people were being
needlessly slaughtered in the background.

Dominique de Villepin, the French foreign minister, described Aristide's
ouster as being the result of "perfect coordination" between the U.S. and
France. In addition, "Mr. Bush telephoned Mr. Chirac to express delight over
'the excellent French-American cooperation in Haiti' and to 'thank France
for its action.'" Colin Powell and Dominique de Villepin also managed to
mend fences during the crisis: "During the Iraq crisis, Mr. Powell and Mr.
de Villepin each felt betrayed by the other. . . But that was then. The
Haiti crisis has required Mr. Powell and Mr. de Villepin to consult
regularly by phone, sometimes more than once a day."

Am I the only one who finds this disgusting? They should have taken it a
step further and described the way Colin's heart would begin to race when he
picked up the phone and heard Dominique's voice on the other end. Colin
never felt comfortable having to constantly worry whether or not Dominique
was still mad at him. They could also describe how Dominique longed for the
days when he and Colin used to be friends, and how he could scarcely
remember the last time they smiled at one another. Ever since they got into
that fight about Iraq their relationship hadn't been the same. Colin seemed
so cold and distant.

If this article demonstrates anything, it is the utter stupidity of the
liberal foreign policy doctrine of "multilateralism," which is not different
in any fundamental way from the Bush administration's policy. Bush says says
he wants to invade Iraq, kill lots of people, install a puppet government,
privatize the economy, and use the country as a springboard for U.S.
dominance over the region. John Kerry says he wants to invade Iraq, kill
lots of people, install a puppet government, privatize the economy, and use
the country as a springboard for U.S. dominance over the region. . . with
the help of the French! Clearly, John Kerry is a man with a vision ญญ a real
ideas-oriented person.

This is the same John Kerry who eloquently and bitterly denounced the U.S.
war against Indochina. Testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee, Kerry referred to the Vietnam War as "barbaric." He detailed
atrocities committed by U.S. soldiers, charging that both they and the U.S.
government were guilty of war crimes. He also asked a question that someone
might want to ask the John Kerry of today: "How do you ask a man to be the
last man to die for a mistake?" We all miss that John Kerry. Either he
forgot to bring his testicles with him when he left the halls of Congress
that day or he has given up on principles and idealism in his old age and
has started making policy decisions based on cynical, self-serving political
calculations.

Obviously, when military interventions are fundamentally unjust it makes no
difference whether they are "multilateral" or "unilateral," which is why
Kerry has not energized anyone in the Democratic Party (the only person
energizing the Democratic Party today is Bush). Ask the residents of
Belgrade how much they appreciated Clinton's commitment to
"multilateralism." Do you think Afghan villagers delight in the fact that a
diverse array of American, French, and British bombs are being dropped on
them? The Bush administration has seized on the Haiti crisis as a way of
countering these limp-wristed attacks on their "unilateralism." It probably
won't be difficult for them to counter such tepid criticisms.

I can't even count the number of times I've heard administration officials
use the words "multilateralism" and "working with the international
community" while talking about their current misdeeds in Haiti. It looks
like Bush will be thoroughly insulated from criticisms of "unilateralism" by
the time November rolls around, not that such arguments were meaningful in
the first place. Their common imperial interests have brought the U.S.
government and the French government back together, and all is fine and
dandy in the "international community."

Unless you are a Haitian who loves democracy, that is. Or a presidential
candidate running on a "be buddies with France again" platform.
--------
Justin Felux can be contacted at justins@alacrityisp.net.

.