20934: kakadjab: NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BLACK LAWYERS on HAITI (fwd)

[Bob Corbett <corbetre@webster.edu>]

From: Kakadjab@aol.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BLACK LAWYERS REQUESTS THAT BUSH ADMINISTRATION
OFFICIALS BE INVESTIGATED FOR WAR CRIMES IN THE KIDNAPPING OF HAITIAN PRESIDENT

The National Conference of Black Lawyers (NCBL) has requested that the
prosecutor for the International Criminal Court investigate whether charges may be
brought against Bush Administration officials for war crimes in the kidnapping
of Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the President of Haiti.

Although the U.S. is not subject to the International Criminal Court’s
jurisdiction, and the Bush Administration demonstrated its utter contempt for the
rule of law by retracting initial U.S. approval of the court, NCBL has pointed
out to the prosecutor that the Central African Republic, where Aristide was
detained against his will, is subject to the court’s jurisdiction, and there
should be a determination of whether that fact gives the court the right to hold
U.S. officials accountable for recent events in Haiti.

The full text of NCBL’s letter to the prosecutor follows. NCBL is also making
preparations to approach the Organization of American States and other
international authorities.



 

March 27, 2004

Luis Moreno-Ocampo

Office of the Prosecutor

c/o International Criminal Court

Maanweg, 174

2516 AB The Hague


The Netherlands

Re: Crimes against President Jean-Bertrand Aristide and the People of Haiti

Dear Mr. Moreno-Ocampo:

The National Conference of Black Lawyers (NCBL) is a U.S.-based international
organization of progressive lawyers and legal workers from Africa and the
African Diaspora that was founded in 1968. One of the key purposes of NCBL is the
support and defense of the right of self-determination for Africa and African
nations and communities in the Diaspora. NCBL regards Haiti as an exemplar of
the struggle for self-determination and independence. This year, the country
celebrates its second centennial of having liberated itself from French
colonialism.

NCBL is outraged by the fact that Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the
democratically-elected President of Haiti, was forced, under threat of immediate death, by
the United States Armed Forces to leave his home and his country on or about
February 29, 2004. According to reports, President Aristide and his wife, Mildred
Aristide, were forced onto a U.S. military plane and held therein against
their will for a period of more than 20 hours. They were then taken by force and
against their will to the Central African Republic, where they were denied
opportunities to have contact with the outside world while being detained under
conditions amounting to house arrest. Although the U.S. government disputes
this version of the events in question, NCBL believes that U.S. accounts of this
occurrence must be rejected in their entirety because of credible Haitian
eyewitnesses, and the U.S. government’s record of blatant lies to the world about
its foreign policy and practices in Iraq and other places.



NCBL most respectfully requests that your office determine whether the
International Criminal Court (ICC) has jurisdiction over all or part of these
occurrences, and that you otherwise initiate an investigation into whether there
have been criminal violations that warrant prosecution. Should you decide to
inquire into this matter, NCBL suggests the following areas for review:

1. In considering the threshold question of whether the ICC has jurisdiction
over the persons involved, we note that Article 12(2) of The Rome Statute of
the International Criminal Court ("Rome Statute") provides that if the conduct
in question occurs on the territory of a State that is a party to the statute,
then the ICC may exercise jurisdiction. Although neither the United States
nor Haiti are parties to the Rome Statute, the Central African Republic is a
party and the site of President Aristide’s detention. We believe the Office of
the Prosecutor should determine whether jurisdiction is appropriate given that
fact.

2. Whether the crimes at issue are appropriately addressed by the ICC
involves consideration of Article 5 of the Rome Statute, which provides that the ICC
has jurisdiction with respect to the crimes of: genocide; crimes against
humanity; war crimes; and the crime of aggression. While we believe that all of
these crimes were committed, we urge that you give special consideration to the
issue of war crimes. We believe that the most relevant provision of the Rome
Statute is Article 8(2)(a)(vii). It provides: "For the purpose of this Statute, ‘
war crimes’ means: Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August
1949, namely, any of the following acts against persons or property protected
under the provisions of the relevant Geneva Convention: *** [u]nlawful deportation
or transfer or unlawful confinement." NCBL has concluded that the U.S.
government (in violation of key provisions of the United Nations Charter that
proscribe aggression and affirm the right to self-determination) is effectively
engaged in warfare against the government and people of Haiti, both through direct
use of U.S. military personnel, and by way of armed proxies who have engaged
in acts of terrorism against the civilian population, and who have staged a
coup d’etat. Furthermore, we believe that as "nominal head of [the Haitian]
armed forces" with the power to declare war, President Aristide should be
protected by the Geneva Convention. We urge that the Office of the Prosecutor
investigate whether the unlawful transfer of President Aristide to the Central African
Republic, and his unlawful confinement in that country constitute crimes
subject to the jurisdiction of the ICC. Per Article 8(1), President Aristide’s
detention was committed as part of a plan to eliminate him and the many members
of his government and political party in Haiti by detention or willful killing.


We most respectfully thank you for your attention to this matter, and we
invite you to call upon us if at any time you believe our services will be helpful
to your efforts.

Sincerely,

 

Mark P. Fancher, Chair

Section on International Affairs & World Peace