28538: Hermantin(News)Aristide probe is at a standstill (fwd)

[Bob Corbett <corbetre@webster.edu>]

From: leonie hermantin <lhermantin@hotmail.com>

Posted on Mon, Jul. 03, 2006


MIAMI HERALD WATCHDOG
Aristide probe is at a standstill
A 2-year-old corruption investigation of Haitian ex-President JeanBertrand 
Aristide is stalled in Haiti's legal system.
BY JACQUELINE CHARLES
jcharles@MiamiHerald.com

• This is the second of two parts.

Shortly after Jean-Bertrand Aristide was ousted as president in 2004, Haiti's 
interim government announced with fanfare that it would get to the bottom of 
alleged corruption in his administration. And for a while, it looked as though 
it would.

Four blistering reports from two government investigative commissions alleged 
that Aristide embezzled more than $20 million of his country's meager public 
funds for the benefit of his private charities, his political party and several 
private firms that existed only on paper.

But two years later, the investigations have stalled, mired in Haiti's 
dysfunctional legal system, polarized politics, and uncertainty over the 
willingness of newly elected President René Préval to pursue the case against 
his one-time mentor.

Aristide also is under investigation by a federal grand jury in Miami, which 
has been reviewing allegations of ties to narco-traffickers, U.S. law 
enforcement officials say. The U.S. probe -- sparked by the rampant flow of 
cocaine through Haiti -- has resulted in 22 convictions of Haitian smugglers, 
ex-police officers and others.

But the legal wrangling in Haiti has turned so chaotic that the top corruption 
investigator, Jean-Yves Nol, was himself jailed for six days in May, accused of 
illegally trying to block a judge's order releasing about $8 million from bank 
accounts of the charitable Aristide Foundation and other foundation-related 
accounts that had been frozen by investigators. The money was eventually 
released, Nol said.

Investigative Judge Jean Ostrict Hercules, who signed the release order and is 
the head a three-judge panel in charge of deciding whether to pursue criminal 
charges against Aristide based on the investigative reports, told The Miami 
Herald that such funds cannot be frozen indefinitely.

Hercules refused to discuss the merits of the reports alleging Aristide 
embezzlements, saying only that his panel has been unable to move the 
investigation forward because it has yet to receive approval from an 
administrative board that must first rule that public funds have been 
mishandled.

Separately, the hope of pursuing Aristide through a civil lawsuit filed in 
Miami last November also appears to be waning. The suit, based on two of the 
most damning investigative reports, has not led to any concrete actions. 
Lawyers for the Haitian government have asked for more time, arguing that they 
have been unable to serve a summons on Aristide because he is in exile in South 
Africa.

Former interim Prime Minister Gérard Latortue says the real cause of the delay 
has been a fight over money with the Chicago law firm handling the lawsuit. The 
firm, Winston & Strawn, did not reply to requests for comment.

''They made an arrangement for us to give them $250,000 and the rest of the 
money . . . they would get from the frozen assets,'' Latortue said. But now, he 
added, 'Each time, they come and do a blackmail and say, `You have to give us 
the money -- or nothing.' ''

OFFICIALS REACT

Préval told The Miami Herald last week that he has asked top officials to 
''look into'' the suit and the investigative reports on Aristide.

Former interim Justice Minister Henri Dorleans, investigator Nol and others 
involved in the corruption probes all insist that the Haitian investigation is 
ongoing. ''I am determined to finish,'' Nol said. ``I love my country. . . . 
Somebody has to fight.''

But the probes' future will depend largely on Préval. In Haiti's highly 
politicized legal system, he will have a strong voice on whether the 
allegations will be pursued or allowed to wither away. Préval, under pressure 
from Aristide allies and foes, has not said what he plans to do.

> From the day the U.S.-backed interim government was installed after 
Aristide's ouster in 2004 amid a violent rebellion, it has insisted that 
proving Aristide embezzled public funds was its priority.

It created two commissions -- Nol's Central Unit for Economic and Financial 
Investigations, known as UCREF for its French acronym, and the Administrative 
Investigative Commission -- to probe Aristide's handling of funds back to 2001, 
the start of his second term.

All government agencies, the Central Bank and the state-owned 
telecommunications company, Teleco, were ordered to audit their books. Latortue 
at one point even demanded that a warrant be issued for Aristide's arrest.

No such warrant was ever issued. And after four reports to Hercules' 
three-judge panel -- two by each of the commissions -- not one person has 
testified before Hercules' panel. Haitian investigative judges act like U.S. 
grand juries, reviewing investigators' reports and deciding whether to file 
charges.

Dorleans defended the interim government's role in the Aristide case and blamed 
the lack of progress on the absence of a ruling by the administrative board 
known as the Superior Court of Auditors and Administrative Disputes. The board, 
whose 10 members were appointed by Aristide, began only in February to consider 
whether public funds were mishandled.

Board President Julien Simon told The Miami Herald that his agency received the 
four reports only in December, and has been unable to find financial documents 
substantiating the allegations.

Haitian investigators argue that because of the lack of documents, they need to 
question people linked to some of the allegations. But they cannot do so 
without an order from Hercules' panel.

MOVEMENT OF FUNDS

The reports by UCREF base its allegation of embezzlement and money laundering 
on the elaborate movement of public funds -- funneled to three paper companies 
and four humanitarian organizations and then swished among them to make the 
origin and destination of the money difficult to trace.

The investigators reported that of the $21 million diverted from government 
accounts, about $2.4 million went directly to charities tied to Aristide and 
his Lavalas Family political party -- allowing him to take credit for 
humanitarian works and strengthening his image as a champion of the poor.

''The judges have been dragging their feet by not going further with the 
findings of the UCREF and Administrative Investigative Commission reports,'' 
said former interim Justice Minister Bernard Gousse, who oversaw the 
investigations before he was forced to resign last summer amid complaints that 
he was too focused on prosecuting Aristide.

''It's not politically motivated when you go after people who stole money from 
the state,'' Gousse told The Miami Herald. ``Now those people [Aristide 
supporters] are powerful enough to put a brake on the investigation and 
furthermore to have the main investigator arrested. . . . The world is upside 
down. Prosecutors cannot be the victims.''