30760: Holmstead (reply) Re: 30745: Durban (comment): re. 30743: Roebling; 30699: Kondrat re Lancet (fwd)

[Bob Corbett <corbetre@webster.edu>]

FROM: John Holmstead

"The Lancet article drew well-deserved fire because it
was a political effort to clean up the Aristide legacy
by slamming the successor Latortue Government, call it
"de facto" government or whatever you
wish."


What an absolute "through the looking glass" crowd
this is. I guess the only real thing this proves is
the Michael Deibert theory, if you repeat something
often enough you start to believe it.