Reviews of Nobel Prize winner | Comments on all Shakespeare's plays | Poetry reviews | Multiple reviews of same author | Haiti books |


A HISTORY OF ROME UNDER THE EMPERORS

By Theodor Mommsen
Translated from the German by Clare Krojzl
New York: Routledge, 1996
ISBN # 0-415-10113-1
642 pages

Comments by Bob Corbett
May 2013

At the end of my notes and comments on this book (which are about 30 pages long) I have a list (in date order) of the 121 Emperors I was able to indentify.

Mommsen was the 1902 Nobel Prize winner. However, reading this work “of his” (so to speak) is a rather strange experience, and not exactly within the frame of my own project. A year or so ago I decided to see how many winners of the Nobel Prize for Literature I could read, hoping to read something of almost all the 100+ authors who have been awarded this prize. In the many I have already read I have been interested both in the content of their writings and the writing itself. But this particular work of Mommsen isn’t really HIS writing at all. It is a reconstruction of his plan for volume IV of his massive History of Rome, which he never actually published. He did give lectures in 1882-83. One of his students, Paul Hansen, took copious and careful notes. Nearly a century later these notes were discovered in a used book store in Nuremberg. They were quite complete. Also, there were other notes which had been recovered from a fire in his home. These notes were seemingly written by Mommsen himself.

This volume, A History of Rome under the Emperors, which was the title selected for the never-published or written vol. IV of his five volumes History of Rome, was reconstructed from these documents.

So, I don’t have a book that is technically “by” Mommsen. Nonetheless, scholars seem quite satisfied that the views expressed in these documents do constitute a very faithful view of Mommsen’s position on the period of the Emperors. Thus, while I don’t have any experience of his writing style itself, I could at least interact with his prodigious understanding of Roman history of this period. It will have to do; it’s all I have been able to find from Mommsen.

Some notes on the -- Introduction by Alexander Demandt pp. 1 – 35

In 1854-56 Mommsen published the first three volumes of his intended five volumes HISTORY OF ROME.

Books 6-7 (imperial history up to the collapse of the Empire in the period of the great migrations was planned) were eventually published late in his life. However, Mommsen died 1903. Vol. 4 was still not written.

  1. He felt there were not adequate source materials
  2. He wasn’t certain where he really came down.
  3. He lacked the emotional commitment to tackle this project.
    “I now know, alas, how little I know, and the divine arrogance has deserted me.”
  4. He saw the ages under the emperors as “. . . those centuries of a decaying culture.”
  5. The sole dynamic element of that period, Christianity, was alien to him.

But there were positives under the emperors too:

  1. They did achieve universal peace
  2. Rome enjoyed generally fortunate circumstances under the better emperors.

Other historians held: “no route leads from Caesar to Augustus.”

They also held that Mommsen’s “. . . liberal republican sentiment” was too opposed to the emperors and Christianity.

MOMMSEN, ROME AND THE GERMAN KAISERREICH.
By Thomas Wiedemann. Pp. 36-52

19th century Germany was struggling for unity and a sense of “nation.” It tended to focus on Greek rather than Roman models thus “Mommsen’s interest in Rome rather than Greece was therefore exceptional (if not unique) amongst nineteenth century German scholars of antiquity.”

He was a former Lutheran, but became quite sympathetic to atheism and republicanism. However his views did not contain the romantic or racialist nationalism of later German nationalism.

He was very much at home in Latin and a fluent reader of English. I have a hard time knowing how he had all that time to read since he also had 16 children!

The center of his living and work in his mature years was Berlin and an important part of his mature work was on Roman inscriptions.

THE BERLIN ACADEMY FRAGMENT Pp. 53-59
This was part of the draft of Vol. 4 of his History of Rome.

Book 6
Consolidation of the Monarch

Ch. 1
Pomperian rebellion and Conspiracy of the Aristocracy.

Mommsen argues that the retreat from constitutional to regal power, beginning with Caesar, deeply weakened the basic structure of Roman leadership.

Government moved from concern for the empire to the protection of personal power.

PAUL HENSENS’S LECTURE NOTES: A HISTORY OF ROME UNDER THE EMPERORS FROM AUGUSTUS TO VESPASIAN. Winter 1882/83.

A HISTORY OF ROME: THE EMPERORS
II: FROM VESPASIAN TO DIOCLETIAN
Summer Semester 1883

1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION Pp. 205 – 206

This is not to be a chronological history of later Emperors but “. . . observations on the Roman Imperial States.”

2. DOMESTIC POLITICS I. Pp. 207 -257

One of the greatest expenditures was road building, especially in Italy. Other important, though lesser, expenditures were on a postal system, building of aqueducts and public building, especially temples. Another important expenditure was alms (especially in the form of corn) and public games.

“The games were of no great moment for the state treasury, but were very important for maintaining a good atmosphere among the urban population. Rarely were games organized at state expense, they were more of a tax on the ambitions of the wealthy.”

There was significant money to support children.

The Roman Empire never really used state debt as a way of building important long-term projects. Mommsen vehemently condemns this policy, arguing that responsible use of state debt is a critical factor in the positive growth of nations.

Municipalities did not tax, but owed most of the city’s land and received income from it.

“Public primary education . . . was never provided under the principate, but always remained a private affair and did not fare too badly. Reading, writing and arithmetic were relatively wide spread skills.”

Many slave owners were desirous of educating their slaves since then they were able to earn more and bring more at the market place.

3. WARS IN THE WEST Pp. 258 – 306.

Much of the Roman beginnings in Africa date back to Caesar, nonetheless the influences are mainly of the Principate not the Republic.

Mommsen complains several times of the lack of reliable data to allow him to detail the African part of the Roman Empire. However, he does allow that evidence indicates:

“The most remarkable feature is the great number of flourishing small rural towns, village upon village, nowadays ruined site upon site, all pressed close to one another, and we can find astonishily luxurious buildings in the most obscure spots.”

Harking back to Greek times, there were important centers of learning and scholars in Rome’s African colonies and this especially showed itself in the development of Christian literature.

Africa was the dominant path of Christianity from East to West.

4. WARS ON THE DANUBE Pp. 307 – 334

5. WAR IN THE EAST Pp. 335 – 352

Mommsen argues that the East is in no way as important to Rome as the West.

However, in the 4th century Persian attacks grew and the shift of the Roman capital from Rome to Constantinople made the Empire more vulnerable to Persian attacks.

HISTORY OF ROME UNDER THE EMPERORS III
FROM DIOCLETIAN TO ALARIC
Winter Semester 1885/6 and Summer 1886
From the fair copy of lecture notes by Sebastian Hensel

A HISTORY OF ROME UNDER THE EMPERORS III FROM DIOCLETIAN TO ALARIC.
Winter Semester 1885/6 and Summer Semester 1886
From the fair copy of lectures notes by Sebastian Hensel

LIST OF THE EMPEROR’S OF ROME

  1. AUGUSTUS (44 BC – AD 14) PP. 63 - 127
  2. TIBERIUS (14 – 37) PP. 128 -151
  3. GAIUS CALIGULA (37 – 41) PP. 152 – 156
  4. CLAUDIUS (41 – 54) PP. 157 – 169
  5. NERO (54 – 68)
  6. GALBA (68 -69)
  7. OTHO (69)
  8. VITELLIUS (69)
  9. VESPASIAN (69 – 79)
  10. TITUS (79 – 81)
  11. DOMITAN (81 – 96)
  12. NERVA (96 – 98)
  13. TRAJAN (98 – 117)
  14. HADRIAN (117 – 138)
  15. ANTONIUS PIUS (138 – 161)
  16. VERSUS, LUCIUS (161 – 169)
  17. MARCUS AURELIUS (161 – 180)
  18. AVIDIUS CASSIUS (175)
  19. COMMODUS (177 – 192)
  20. PERTINAX (193)
  21. DIDIUS JULIANUS (193)
  22. SEPTIMUS SERVUS (193 – 211)
  23. PESCENNIUS NIGER (193 – 195)
  24. CLODIUS ALBINUS (193 -197)
  25. CARACALLA ( 198 – 217)
  26. GETA (209 – 211)
  27. MACRINUS (217 – 218)
  28. DIADUMENIAN (217 – 218)
  29. ELGABALUS (218 – 222)
  30. SERERUS, ALEXANDER (222 – 235)
  31. MAXIMINUS THRAX (235 – 238)
  32. GORDIAN I (238)
  33. GORDIAN II (238)
  34. PUPIENUS (238)
  35. BALBINUS (238)
  36. GORDIAN III (238 – 244)
  37. SABINIANUS (240)
  38. PHILIP THE ARAB (244 – 249)
  39. PACATIANUS (248)
  40. JOTAPIANUS (248 – 249)
  41. SILBANNACUS (248 – 253)
  42. DECIUS (249 – 251)
  43. PRISCUS (249 – 252)
  44. LICINIANUS (250)
  45. HERENNIUS ETRUSCUS (251)
  46. HOSTILIAN (251)
  47. GALLUS (251 – 253)
  48. VOLUSIANUS (251 – 253)
  49. AEMILIANUS (253)
  50. VALERIAN (253 – 260)
  51. GALLIENUS (253 -- 268
  52. SALONINUS (260)
  53. INGENUUS (260)
  54. REGALIANUS (260)
  55. MACRIANUS MAJOR (260 – 261)
  56. MACRIANUS MINOR (260 -261)
  57. QUIETUS (260 -261)
  58. MUSSIUS AEMILIANUS (268)
  59. AUREOLUS (268)
  60. CLADIUS GOTHICUS (270)
  61. QUINTILLUS (270)
  62. AURELIAN (270 – 275)
  63. TACITUS (275 – 276)
  64. FLORIANUS (276)
  65. PROBUS (276 – 282)
  66. JULIUS SATURNINUS (280)
  67. PROCULUS (280)
  68. BONOSUS (280)
  69. CARUS (282 – 283)
  70. CARINUS (283 – 285)
  71. NUMERIANUS (283 – 284)
  72. POSTUMUS (260 – 274)
  73. LAELIANUS (268)
  74. MARIUS (269)
  75. VICTORINUS (269 -271)
  76. DOMITIANUS II (270 – 271)
  77. TETRICUS I (271 – 274)
  78. CARAUSIUS (286 -293)
  79. ALLECTUS (293 – 297)
  80. DIOCLETIAN (284 – 305)
  81. MAXIMIAN (286 – 305)
  82. CONSTANTIUS CHLORUS (305 – 306)
  83. GALERIUS (305 – 311)
  84. SERVERUS, FLAVIUS VALERIUS (306 – 307)
  85. MAXENTIUS (306 – 312)
  86. CONSTANTINE I (312 – 337)
  87. DOMITIUS ALEXANDER (308 – 311)
  88. LICINIUS (308 – 324)
  89. MAXIMINUS DAIS (311 – 313)
  90. VALERIUS VALENS (316 – 317)
  91. SEXTUS MARTINIANUS (324)
  92. CONSTANTINE II (337 – 340)
  93. CONSTANTIUS II (337 – 361)
  94. CONSTANS (337 – 350)
  95. MAGNENTIUS (350 – 353)
  96. VETRANIO (350)
  97. NEPOTIANUS (350)
  98. JULIAN (360/361 – 363)
  99. JOVIAN (363 – 364)
  100. VALENTINIAN I (364 – 375)
  101. VALENS (364 – 378)
  102. PROCOPIUS (365 – 378)
  103. GRATIAN (367 – 383)
  104. VALENTINIAN II (375 – 392)
  105. MAGNUS MAXIMUS (383 – 388)
  106. FLAVIUS VICTOR (386 – 388
  107. EUGENIUS (392 – 394)
  108. THEODOSIUS I (379 – 395)
  109. ARCADOIUS (383 – 408)
  110. HONORIUS (393 – 423)
  111. CONSTANTINE III (407 – 411)
  112. CONSTANS II (409 – 411)
  113. PRISCUS ATTALUS (409 and 414 – 415)
  114. MAXIMUS (409 – 411)
  115. JOVINUS (411 – 413)
  116. SEBASTIANUS (412 – 413)
  117. THEODOSIUS II (408- 450)
  118. CONSTANTIUS III (421)
  119. JOANNES (423 – 425)
  120. VALENTINIAN III (425 – 455)
  121. MARCIAN (450 – 457)
Bob Corbett corbetre@webster.edu

BACK TO BOOK REVIEWS


Becoming Reading Thinking Journals

HOME

Bob Corbett corbetre@webster.edu