[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
5869: Corbett replies to Dorce reply to Manus
>From Bob Corbett:
I am rather startled and most disappointed in Kathy Dorce's response
on her charge against Mr. Manus. Dorce makes a serious allegation
that there is a hidden and somehow evil agenda in Mr. Manus' project.
I have no idea in the world if this is so and no view on it.
However, when fairly challenged to provide some defense of this
claim which is offered without a shred of evidence on her part and no
detail, Dorce attempts to turn the table and suggest that the question is
somehow suspect because Mr. Manus' brother raises it.
I am not Mr. Manus' relation, don't know him at all, don't know
his program. But I too wondered what hidden information Dorce
had that would lead to this character-damaging suggestion and yet
no evidence offered. But, I admit, I wasn't much curious to know
and didn't ask.
Then when I see how Dorce treats a most fair call to defend
her charge and she that uses a tactic of demeaning the question because
it comes from his brother, well, then I become most curious as to
the source and nature of this charge.
I think it is a most fair question and am astonished at what
seems to me a most irresponsible and flip reply from Dorce on this
chracter-damaging claim she makes. I believe any person deserve a
more fair treatment that Mr. Manus received from Dorce in her