[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
#4334: Something rotten.. Kozyn responds (fwd)
From: John Kozyn <email@example.com>
From: Lisa Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>fact that the writer was carrying an "Epirb," a device that sends out a
>distress signal that will summon the coast guard, left me feeling queasy
>about that kind of journalism.
This isn't the worst thing about this article.
--> snip <--
>The moment the journalist got on board with such a high-tech device as the
>Epirb, he ceased to be a reporter of the story and became in a way the
>creator of the story. He could alert the coast guard at any time--for noble
>reasons like saving everyone's life, or less noble reasons like feeling
>nauseated, feeling scared, exhausted, etc. Which made it kind of fake. Not
>fake of course to the other passengers who were risking everything to get
>to the US--and that's why it was heartbreaking, because they had no idea
>that with the push of a button he could crush their dreams.
You're right Lisa. Michael Finkel offer the NYT's readership one of the most
obnoxious examples of a journalist thinking he's above it all. This is one
of the most existentially inauthentic pieces of nonsense I've come across.
--> snip <--
>So on one hand I applaud the author and the Times for
>running it. I applaud the courage and fortitude of everyone on the boat. On
>the hand that's not clapping though, I think the writer should have been
>more straightforward about a hugely important piece of the story, which is
>whether or not he sent out that signal.
I only read this article once. I don't think he set it off though. It seems
the CG returned because of suspicion about copious amounts of water on board
- IIRC. He could be BS'ing though.
>I'm curious to know what other people think.
I'll bet Finkel and his photog did a lot of butt-kissing once the CG arrived
though, all the while pretending they played no role in facilitating the
building and crashing of David's hopes to get to the U.S.
I wonder if they said goodbye to him or other people whose names they got to
know on the journey. I wonder if they ever felt guilty for being so
inauthentic? I also wonder if the CG got a heads-up from the NYT's editors -
worried about his safety in this "rickety" boat.
I think the NYT's magazine editors need to wake up. The story is not the
most important thing. Human beings are. When journalists - and their role -
become the news (as they did when this story first broke last month)
something is definitely wrong.
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com