20733: Esser: Re: 20718: Goodman: Re: 20690: Esser: Haiti Human Rights Protest on Wash. Mall (fwd)

[Bob Corbett <corbetre@webster.edu>]

From: D. E s s e r <torx@joimail.com>

So you feel that Aristide left voluntarily? No problem with that, but
then you state "they DIPLOMATICALLY forced him out". It is my
understanding that, at least in a legal and moral sense, if force,
may it be diplomatically or otherwise, is applied, it isn't all that
voluntarily. Unless of course there is maybe something like a new
Haitian law that states "any forced removal from office shall be
considered voluntary", for my part, I doubt that. By the way: this
list isn't really for or against Bush, what may be good in your view
for you, Bush or the U.S. might not necessarily viewed as such by
others. Why is that so offensive to you? And, allow me to speak for
most of us here, I don't think anybody is feeling sorry for
ourselves, it is rather Haiti and it's people we may feel sorry for.


Brian Goodman <bdgoody2002@yahoo.com> writes:

Since nobody else ever posts things backing Bush ...I will.  Let's go
back a month in time  (not 200 years like the Titid supporters like
to do) to the day when Titid VOLUNTARILY left Haiti.  If he had not
...the rebels would have most likely killed him and his family.  The
US, Canada, and France did not want to see any more blood shed and
that is why they DIPLOMATICALLY forced him out.
...