21923: Saint-Vil: RE: 21892: Simidor on Arrest of So Ann (fwd)

[Bob Corbett <corbetre@webster.edu>]

From: Jean Saint-Vil <jafrikayiti@hotmail.com>


Simidor wrote:

"US intervention was mandated by the UN Security Council.  In that sense it is
not “illegal.”  "

Oh, of course not !

Likewise, there is nothing to investigate in the sudden departure of Aristide
from Haiti, nicely accompanied by U.S. Marines. The UN Security Council says it
legal as everything else, like the crowning of a Boca Raton resident by the
council of "sages", itself named by a tripartite something. Perfectly legal !
Not to be found in any Haitian Constitution but, the Security Council says it
good, therefore it good boy!

 Perhaps the U.N. Security Council should take the opportunity to render this
island productive once again by re-instating racial slavery. After all, was it
not that system which made it once "the pearl of the antilles", until these
Africans came - broke THE LAW ! and ruined everything. I am sure Kofi would
gladly carry this message as he always does so nicely. Afterall, there
are plenty Haitians "revolutionaries" willing to applaud anything our
enlightned self-imposed friends might suggest is best for us.

Those who could not celebrate on January 1, 2004 should now have a great old
party with Rochambeau et. al.


Jafrikayiti

«Depi nan Ginen bon nèg ap ede nèg!»
http://www.jafrikayiti.com
US intervention was mandated by the UN Security Council.  In that sense it is
not “illegal.”  Again, would Vilaire and the Lavalas supporters denounce the US
presence with such fervor if Bush had sent in the Marines before Feb. 29 to
bail Aristide out?  Or would they be hard at work convincing the world that
this intervention, much like in 1994, is not really an intervention?
“Lafyèv la pa nan dra, se nan san li ye”
“The fever is in the blood, not in the sheets” (Haitian proverb)
Daniel Simidor