[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
8151: More on the Cointreau workers (fwd)
From: Tttnhm@aol.com
Update on the situation at Guacimal-Madeline - May 2001
(edited by the Haiti Support Group.)
Madeline, in northern Haiti, is where Guacimal's orange processing plant is
located. It is here that oranges grown on plantations in St Raphaël and
elsewhere, are halved and put into an extracting unit which separates the
essential oil used to produce the Cointreau liqueur from the rest of the
orange. About three dozen workers are employed at Guacimal-Madeline.
In September 2000, the newly formed union of workers at Guacimal-Madeline was
forced to restructure its negotiating committee because the Guacimal
management refused to recognise the union's delegate. After an ensuing delay
of about one month, negotiations at the end of October led to an agreement to
improve work conditions by supplying gloves, knives and face masks to the
workers. When the workers demanded to know why it had taken so long for them
to be provided with this equipment which seemed to be so readily available,
management's answer was that "they hadn't had a union then."
Since then, much like at St Raphaël, the management has used intimidation and
stalling tactics to forestall having to comply with Haitian law. There has
been no significant improvement in the plight of the workers, despite a
renewed international solidarity campaign and the visit at the beginning of
November of a Cointreau representative. (Mr. Morineau was escorted by
management on a brief tour of the plant and was prevented from engaging in
any dialogue with the workers.) On the contrary, the plant's management seems
to be determined to punish the workers for their union affiliation.
Thus, during the week of 20 November, management decided to discipline
workers for any absence. Traditionally, employment at the Madeline plant has
been passed on from father to son and from mother to daughter. This allowed
sick workers to be temporarily replaced by their family members during their
illness. The plant supervisor, Philippe Mompoint, suddenly declared that this
practice would no longer be allowed, and that sick workers must now be
replaced by different substitutes each day. The aim of this provision is to
introduce replacement workers as a union-busting measure, and in particular
to thwart workers at Madeline from taking any leave to coordinate their
struggles with the workers in St Raphaël. Considering that only 32 workers
are employed at Madeline, the introduction of permanent replacements in cases
of absence is a particularly harsh measure.
In negotiations in November, the union put forward a demand for a wage
increase from 11 cents (US) to 80 cents (US) per container of oranges
processed. The management's answer was to offer an insignificant 5 cents
increase. (During the harvest period teams of 2 to 3 workers process an
average of 20 containers of oranges per day). Management's promises to
provide showers, repair toilets and improve the general conditions in the
plant remained unfulfilled.
Faced with management's intransigence and the continued harassment of workers
affiliated with the union, in mid-December, the Madeline union called a work
stoppage. While the union's management committee travelled to Cap-Haïtien to
ask the Ministry of Social Affairs to intervene, the factory manager took
advantage of their absence to intimidate the remaining workers by tipping
whole oranges into the extraction unit before they had been cut in half. Note
that normally in the factory the inadvertent adding of whole oranges to the
unit is severely reprimanded.) This very clear threat to dismiss those who
cut the oranges, coupled with physical intimidation of the striking workers,
forced them to call a halt to their work stoppage, although they determined
to relaunch their struggle at a later date.
During the month of January, the union of workers at Guacimal-St Raphaël
courageously maintained their strike, and the workers at Madeline only cut
some oranges harvested in areas around Cap-Haïtien. Guacimal owner, Daniel
Zéphir, announced that he would never meet with the union at St Raphaël and
would only meet the Madeline union, and attempted to drive a wedge between
the two unions by suggesting the strike at St Raphaël was the reason for the
lack of work at Madeline. He largely succeeded in this attempt to break the
union as many people then chose not to attend the Madeline union meetings.
On 7 February, Daniel Zéphir told the workers at Madeline that he was waiting
for his President, referring to Gérard Gourgue, the Democratic Convergence's
symbolic president in opposition to President Aristide. He told them that if
they wanted to get paid that day, the day of the presidential inauguration,
they should ask "their father, Aristide". Later on, for the Carnival days of
26 and 27 February, the same thing happened. Just as he had refused to pay
the workers for the official holidays of 1 and 2 January, Zéphir refused to
pay wages on these days.
Although the workers protested, along with the workers at Zéphir's other
businesses in St Raphaël and Cap-Haïtien who were not paid either, Zéphir
refused to hear them, declaring the file closed. He cited article 114 of the
fair labour standards act, which does not envisage these payments for
seasonal workers. On the other hand, article 112 of the same act stipulates
that any permanent worker must profit from it, and it is easy for the owners
to temporarily declare a 'dead' season in order to avoid paying wages for
public holidays.
In May, at Guacimal Madeline, work stopped for the season. The management has
affected a pretence of reason by recognising the existence of the trade union
and meeting them on some occasions. Latrines have been installed. But despite
everything in this season 2000-2001, nothing serious has been resolved. The
wage increase - from 2.75 to 4.00 gourdes i.e. from 11 to 16 cents of a US$
per case of oranges treated - was ridiculous.
On top of this, the union was scandalised, when, as usual at the end of the
work season, workers claimed their yearly loan (generally a meagre two
hundred Haitian dollars, meaning less than US$ 50) and were informed they
would have to sign for it in front of a public notary. Many refused,
interpreting this as a further maneuver on the part of the management to
indebt them forever and to engage their families in case of their death. Note
that these loans have never been defaulted on in the past…
There are rumors that the factory may be moved to St Raphaël, but they have
not been confirmed. In light of the recent events there, this seems highly
unlikely; nevertheless, there is some anxiety at Madeline.
Information supplied by Batay Ouvriye, see http://www.batayouvriye.com
For background information on the Cointreau orange workers' struggle see:
The Haiti Support Group web site campaigns section:
http://www.gn.apc.org/haitisupport/fea_campaign_index.html
and
Multinational Monitor's Winning Campaigns:"Haiti's Thirst for Justice":
http://www.essential.org/monitor/mm2001/01jan-feb/corp9.html
_____________________________________________________________This email is
forwarded to you as a service of the Haiti Support Group.
SEE THE HAITI SUPPORT GROUP WEB SITE: <A
HREF="http://www.gn.apc.org/haitisupport">http://www.gn.apc.org/haitisupport
</A>
The Haiti Support Group - solidarity with the Haitian people's struggle for
justice, participatory democracy and equitable development, since 1992.
______________________________________________________